Amalgama / Competitor Evidence Board

Compare evidence. Not sales pitches.

Put two to four suppliers side by side using their published claims. Every populated cell keeps its source quote. Missing information stays missing.

01 / Set the evidence

Your shortlist

Public excerpts only. No browsing, account access or automatic vendor scoring.

Source 01Company namePublic source URLPaste the relevant excerpt0 / 4,500 characters

Source 02Company namePublic source URLPaste the relevant excerpt0 / 4,500 characters

Compare on

One criterion per line. 3 / 6 criteria. Up to 100 characters each.

This text is public or redacted. I agree to send it to Amalgama’s AI processor.

Text is sent to Google’s AI service through our server. Do not include personal, confidential or regulated data. Shared usage limits apply. Drafts are not saved across page reloads. Privacy policy

02 / Inspect the claims

The evidence board

Same questions. Comparable evidence.

A side-by-side view of what each supplier actually states, with room for your judgment.

1 Add a source or try the example
2 Check the proposed result
3 Export work you have reviewed

Build a vendor comparison matrix

Paste public product documentation, feature descriptions or policy excerpts. Add the page URL and up to six criteria. This tool reads your pasted text, not the linked website.

Separate evidence from interpretation

A quote match checks the wording, not the truth or relevance of a vendor claim. Read each cell, add your own notes and keep only the evidence you trust. There are no invented ratings or automatic winners.

Export a supplier evaluation brief

Download reviewed cells as CSV with the company, criterion, exact quotation and source URL. A missing claim means “not stated in this excerpt”, not “the vendor cannot do it”.

Need this connected to your workflow? Discuss an integration